Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1243Hits:21483643Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID188685
Title ProperExploring the Faultlines in Kyrgyzstan's Post 2010 Premier-Presidential System
LanguageENG
AuthorBawa, Jagmeet ;  Singh, Gurphej
Summary / Abstract (Note)At independence in 1991, Kyrgyzstan inherited the former Soviet Union's distinct 'semi-presidential' system combining a robust president, a weak parliament, and a meek prime minister. Its governance then was categorized as a 'president-parliamentary' system under Shugart and Carey's typology. However, Kyrgyzstan's 2010 'April Revolution' paved the way for a new 'premier-presidential' system intended to elevate the status of the prime minister and parliament and thereby diffuse power among rival political elites. This 'premier-presidential' system turned out to be a short-lived experiment: the 2020 'October Uprising' resulted in a turn to a system of 'strong presidentialism'. This study aims to present an analysis of the fissures in the 'premier-presidential' system of 2010-2020 which eventually contributed to its downfall. It argues that the downfall of the premier-presidential system was primarily caused by two sets of factors, structural and contingent, working in tandem.
`In' analytical NoteAsian Affairs Vol. 53, No.4; Nov 2022: p.888-913
Journal SourceAsian Affairs Vol: 53 No 4
Key WordsKyrgyzstan ;  Accountability ;  Semi-Presidential System ;  President-Parliamentary System ;  Premier-Presidential System


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text