Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:3736Hits:20923613Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID189048
Title ProperSoutheast Asia under Great-Power Competition
Other Title InformationPublic Opinion About Hedging in the Philippines
LanguageENG
AuthorLi, Xiaojun ;  Fang, Songying ;  Songying Fang
Summary / Abstract (Note)Under pressure to choose between the U.S. and China, Southeast Asian countries have adopted a hedging strategy: deepening economic relations with China while strengthening security cooperation with the U.S. How does the region's public view this strategy? With tensions rising in South China Sea territorial disputes, are more nationalistic individuals more likely to oppose hedging? Using an original public opinion survey conducted in the Philippines, we find that while an overwhelming majority of respondents were concerned about the territorial disputes, more nationalistic Filipinos were no more concerned than less nationalistic ones. Further, more nationalistic Filipinos were more likely to view economic relations with China as important for the Philippines and to approve of Duterte's China policy, which follows the logic of hedging. These surprising findings suggest that under the shadow of great-power competition, the link between domestic politics and foreign policy is nuanced in the Philippines, and Southeast Asia in general.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of East Asian Studies Vol. 22, No.3; Nov 2022: p.481 - 501
Journal SourceJournal of East Asian Studies Vol: 22 No 3
Key WordsNationalism ;  Territorial Disputes ;  Southeast Asia ;  Hedging Strategy ;  The Philippines ;  US–China competition


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text