Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1944Hits:21570451Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID189059
Title ProperFrom Government–Society to Party–Masses
Other Title Informationthe Community Governance Mode Change in Shenzhen
LanguageENG
AuthorYing, Liu ;  Cai Changkun , Jiang Weiqi , Liu Ying ;  Changkun , Cai ;  Weiqi , Jiang
Summary / Abstract (Note)Most urban community studies in China rely on the state–society framework. However, this structural perspective can hardly explain the diverse modes of community governance and their changes over time. This article outlines Shenzhen's 20-year (1999–2019) history of community reform and constructs a framework based on historical institutionalism to analyse Shenzhen's community governance modes over various periods and their changes. First, diversified governance ideas and power structures constructed various community governance modes over this period. Second, community governance mode changes were embedded in local grassroots governance fields. The original governance arrangements, the policy guidance and the ideas of the dominant agencies (the Ministry of Civil Affairs and the Party) at different stages are critical in explaining the transformation of community governance modes. Third, the dominant subject's institutional bricolage within the constraints and empowerment of the institutional context was the critical mechanism of the governance mode transformation. The historical institutionalism framework for community governance transformation provides a new direction for understanding community reform and evaluating evolving local state–society relations.
`In' analytical NoteChina: An International Journal Vol. 20, No.4; Nov 2022: p.41-65
Journal SourceChina: An International Journal 2022-12 20, 4
Key WordsShenzhen ;  Government–Society to Party–Masses ;  Community Governance Mode