| ID | 190104 |
| Title Proper | Learning the lessons of COVID-19 |
| Other Title Information | homeland resilience in the United Kingdom - is it now time for both a dedicated civil defense organization and a paramilitary force? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Miron, Marina ; Rod, Thornton |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The United Kingdom’s homeland resilience capacity is poor. The COVID-19 pandemic proved this. Back in 2019, the UK had been labeled as the best prepared country in the world for a pandemic. And yet, by 2020, and once COVID-19 had struck, the UK became “unequivocally” the hardest hit country in Europe – particularly in terms of excess mortality. In this article it is argued that the UK’s continental neighbors coped better than the UK because they had better homeland resilience capacity. This was provided by their having civil defense organizations, paramilitary forces and militaries which are specifically designed to contribute to homeland emergencies. The UK, in contrast and almost uniquely in the world, lacks both civil defense and paramilitary bodies and, moreover, it has armed forces that are not actually structured to provide help in domestic emergencies. Given the problems highlighted during COVID-19, is it now time for the UK to set up its own bodies specifically tasked with alleviating domestic emergencies? This article explores this question by comparing the UK’s pandemic response with that of Spain – a country which, according to all available data, should have performed worse than the UK. But it did not. Why? |
| `In' analytical Note | Defence Studies Vol. 23, No.1; Mar 2023: p.105-125 |
| Journal Source | Defence Studies Vol: 23 No 1 |
| Key Words | Civil defense ; COVID-19 ; Homeland Resilience ; UK Defense Policy ; Spain and COVID-19 ; Sub-threshold warfare |