| ID | 192019 |
| Title Proper | Nuclear Taboo and the Inevitability of Uncertainty |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Bell, Mark S |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The nuclear taboo—a strong normative inhibition on the use of nuclear weapons—is one of the most important concepts in the study of nuclear weapons.Footnote1 In the last few years, however, the idea of the taboo has come under attack. Notably, a series of studies have shown that mass publics appear quite comfortable with using nuclear weapons.Footnote2 When given hypothetical scenarios in which nuclear use might be considered, publics appear willing to use nuclear weapons, and concerns about (im)morality appear to weigh less heavily than narrow assessments of military utility. In the latest contribution to this research agenda, Janina Dill, Scott D. Sagan, and Benjamin A. Valentino (hereafter DSV) demonstrate that not only Americans appear comfortable with nuclear use.Footnote3 Surveying publics in France, Israel, the United Kingdom, and the United States, they show similar patterns in each country: respondents are surprisingly willing to use nuclear weapons and appear responsive to assessments of military utility. Scholars previously raised the possibility that US publics might be unusual as a caveat qualifying prior findings.Footnote4 DSV’s argument and evidence thus represent an important contribution, showing that prior findings can in fact be replicated across a range of democracies. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Studies Vol. 32, No.1; Jan-Mar 2023: p.166-172 |
| Journal Source | Security Studies Vol: 32 No 1 |
| Key Words | Nuclear Taboo ; Inevitability of Uncertainty |