Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1226Hits:21495098Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID192021
Title ProperWho Is Getting Nuked? Nuclear Taboo, Adversary Types, and Atomic Dispositions
LanguageENG
AuthorJoshi, Yogesh
Summary / Abstract (Note)Janina Dill, Scott Sagan and Benjamin Valentino have demonstrated how calculations over the morality of contending norms may influence public's readiness to use nuclear weapons. I argue that such atomic dispositions are highly contingent on the nature of the adversary. Public may react differently to various nuclear targets because adversaries evoke different levels of retributiveness. When deciding between the lives of fellow citizens and those of foreign noncombatants, a bargain is easier to reach against targets which evoke feelings of hatred and anger due to historical, cultural or domestic political reasons. Using the Indian case, I demonstrate why the variance in the character of the threat is a substantive issue. Specifically, I show why the India-China dyad exhibits a greater degree of normative prohibition compared to the India-Pakistan dyad.
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Studies Vol. 32, No.1; Jan-Mar 2023: p.180-187
Journal SourceSecurity Studies Vol: 32 No 1
Key WordsNuclear Taboo ;  Adversary Type ;  Atomic Dispositions


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text