Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1954Hits:21576158Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID193709
Title ProperOutbreak of Selective Attribution
Other Title InformationPartisanship and Blame in the COVID-19 Pandemic
LanguageENG
AuthorGRAHAM, MATTHEW H. ;  Singh, Shikhar
Summary / Abstract (Note)Crises and disasters give voters an opportunity to observe the incumbent’s response and reward or punish them for successes and failures. Yet, even when voters perceive events similarly, they tend to attribute responsibility selectively, disproportionately crediting their party for positive developments and blaming opponents for negative developments. We examine selective attribution during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, reporting three key findings. First, selective attribution rapidly emerged during the first weeks of the pandemic, a time in which Democrats and Republicans were otherwise updating their perceptions and behavior in parallel. Second, selective attribution is caused by individual-level changes in perceptions of the pandemic. Third, existing research has been too quick to explain selective attribution in terms of partisan-motivated reasoning. We find stronger evidence for an explanation rooted in beliefs about presidential competence. This recasts selective attribution’s implications for democratic accountability.
`In' analytical NoteAmerican Political Science Review Vol. 118, No.1; Feb 2024: p.423 - 441
Journal SourceAmerican Political Science Review Vol: 118 No 1


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text