| ID | 194004 |
| Title Proper | Irregular warfare in strategic competition |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Chinchilla, Alexandra |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | After two decades of counterinsurgency and counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Iraq, the US military has shifted to preparing for large-scale combat operations. However, it would be a mistake to discard hard-earned lessons from these conflicts. Despite contemporary advances in technology and important differences between current US competitors and the Soviet Union, irregular warfare will play a prominent role in the new era of strategic competition. It was a prominent form of US-Soviet competition during the Cold War, is already used extensively by the United States and its competitors and remains attractive given concerns about escalation between nuclear-armed powers. Given the continued relevance of irregular warfare, we focus on two main lessons from the US experience. First, since irregular warfare is about influencing populations and achieving political goals without large-scale combat operations, influencing and working alongside the partner is the primary mission. The second lesson follows directly from the first; if irregular warfare is ultimately about achieving policy goals with an economy of military force, IW is a team sport requiring joint and interagency collaboration to be effectively implemented. |
| `In' analytical Note | Defence Studies Vol. 24, No.1; Mar 2024: p.148-158 |
| Journal Source | Defence Studies 2024-03 24, 1 |
| Key Words | Security ; Counterinsurgency ; Great Powers ; Irregular Warfare ; Strategic Competition |