Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:693Hits:36582706Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID194585
Title ProperMaking pushbacks public
Other Title InformationSecrecy, material witnesses and devices of dis/appearance
LanguageENG
AuthorGlouftsios, Georgios
Summary / Abstract (Note)In early 2021, the European Parliament established the Frontex Scrutiny Working Group (FSWG) to monitor all aspects of the functioning of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex). The FSWG organized a series of public hearings and carried out a ‘fact-finding’ investigation to gather information and evidence about pushbacks of refugees in the Aegean Sea. By unpacking some of the controversies that emerged during the hearings of the FSWG, I explore how secrecy was practised and strategically employed to obscure the responsibility of Frontex for the reported pushbacks, and how it was contested through the presentation of related evidence. I explain how secrecy and related controversies and struggles over making pushbacks public involve a variety of actors that enrol and interact with a heterogeneous set of objects, including digital, visual and archival traces of violence at sea, as well as databases used to record information about maritime incidents. I argue that secrecy regarding pushbacks is not just about keeping information about people and objects involved in security operations hidden. Secrecy is also produced through the selective recording, (mis)categorization and circulation of information in the name of transparency.
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Dialogue Vol. 55, No.1; Feb 2024: p. 3-21
Key WordsMigration ;  Borders ;  Transparency ;  Secrecy ;  FRONTEX