| ID | 195394 |
| Title Proper | Future is just another past |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Leira, Halvard ; Kessler, Oliver |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Before International Studies can confront the future, it needs to get a better grip on its past and present. The discipline lacks agreement on both its own name and the name of its object of study. More importantly, key concepts used to describe phenomena have changed continuously: no concept emerging in the 19th century has remained untouched, no envisioned future of the past could have prepared us for the present. Old concepts have been discarded, new ones adopted, and existing ones modified. This implies that any exercise in ‘futurology’ must necessarily come with an openness towards conceptual change, and that a key challenge for International Studies going forward will consist in matching our conceptual toolbox to an ever-changing world. The importance of conceptual change has until recently been neglected in the study of global politics. Thus, in this paper we start by presenting the empirical case for incorporating conceptual change by laying out key past and present conceptual changes in the international realm. We then move on to a presentation of conceptual history and the tools it provides us for grasping conceptual change, before discussing how to tackle conceptual developments when thinking about the future of global politics. |
| `In' analytical Note | Review of International Studies Vol. 50, No.03; May 2024: p.425 - 440 |
| Journal Source | Review of International Studies Vol: 50 No 3 |
| Key Words | Future ; Conceptual History ; Past ; Present ; Historical International Relations |