| ID | 195428 |
| Title Proper | Audience agency in a curious instance of failed securitization |
| Other Title Information | Public resistance to the Singapore government’s eugenics program |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Krishnan, Pradeep |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Securitization theory posits that security threats are socially constructed. Yet, how audiences influence the failure and success of securitization attempts is still not well understood. In this article, I argue that audiences bring their normative perspectives to bear upon the interpretation of securitization attempts. This theoretical addendum, I hold, permits a fuller appreciation of how audiences express their agency when receiving securitization attempts. I examine the Singaporean context, where the discursive backdrop favours the construction of security threats. While the Singaporean government has successfully securitized many issues, Lee Kuan Yew’s attempt to securitize the country’s declining birth rates failed dramatically. This occurred, I contend, as the Singaporean public was deeply offended by the normative premises of Lee’s eugenicist argument, thus refusing to engage with the issue on the government’s terms. These objections were only fuelled by the eugenics programme the government later introduced, ultimately causing the government to discontinue its pronatalist policies and significantly revise its rhetoric. This article develops the understanding of how securitization unfolds by expanding on the conceptualization of audience behaviour. By examining Singapore, which has failed to inspire many analyses of securitization, it also diversifies securitization theory’s empirical reach, highlighting its intelligibility within non-democratic contexts. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Dialogue Vol. 55, No.2; Apr 2024: p.179-196 |
| Key Words | Singapore ; Resistance ; Securitization ; Agency ; Normative ; Audience |