| ID | 196777 |
| Title Proper | Get the word out |
| Other Title Information | Monitoring human rights reduces abuse |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Kaire, José |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Does human rights advocacy make a difference? Many are skeptical. Studies often find that advocates have an impact only under limited circumstances. I argue that these underwhelming results are a by-product of an identification problem. Research so far has effectively focused on whether shaming campaigns reduce ongoing abuse. But such cases are only part of the story. Another big aspect of advocacy is preventing abuse from ever starting. We must then pay attention to the deterred, those who chose not to violate human rights because of the threat of shaming. These cases do not repress and are never shamed. They are easy to miss because they look the same as those who never considered abuse in the first place. However, identifying deterred cases is crucial for judging the effectiveness of advocacy. I argue that we can resolve this issue by focusing on the degree of human rights monitoring in a country. Doing so allows researchers to recognize those under the scrutiny of advocates, and hence those that could have been deterred even if they were never shamed. Once we do this analytical refocus it is easy to see the positive effect of human rights advocacy. Human rights monitoring reduces abuse, and it does so in most countries. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Peace Research Vol. 61, No.5; Sep 2024: p.808 - 824 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Peace Research 2024-10 61, 5 |
| Key Words | Human Rights ; Repression ; Monitoring ; Shaming |