Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:405Hits:38453692Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID198619
Title ProperPolitics of Delay in Crisis Negotiations
LanguageENG
AuthorDong, Haonan
Summary / Abstract (Note)States often intentionally stall crisis negotiations, hoping to build arms or attract allies to achieve a more favorable bargaining position. Why do their adversaries tolerate delay in some cases, but attack upon delay in others? I argue that this is because states cannot perfectly distinguish between intentional and unavoidable delays. This presents a strategic tension: a state prefers to attack preventively if the delay is intentional, but prefers to avoid costly war otherwise. To study this tension, I build a formal model of crisis bargaining with delay tactics, showing that rising states may mask bargaining delays behind natural exogenous delays to complete a peaceful power shift. I find that uncertainty over the source of delay may decrease the risk of war under some conditions, and increase the risk of war under others. I discuss the implications of my theoretical model for the causes of war and power shifts in historical cases.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 69, No.5; May 2025: p.793 - 813
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution 2025-05 69, 5
Key WordsConflict ;  Game Theory ;  Interstate Conflict ;  Negotiation ;  Bargaining ;  Power War