Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
124907
|
|
|
Publication |
2013.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Conflicts between China and the U.S. on African issues center on differences in ideology and strategic perception. In fact, the American and Chinese presence in Africa should be complementary and mutually beneficial, and so conducive to African development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
172553
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Political leaders, policy-makers and academics routinely refer to development as an objective process of social change through the use of technical, value-free terms. Images of poverty and inequality are regularly presented as evidence of a world that exists ‘out there’ where development unfolds. This way of seeing reflects the value of scientific forms of knowledge but also sits in tension with the normative foundations of development that take European modernization and industrialization as the benchmark for comparison. The role images play in this process is often overlooked. This article argues that a dominant mode of visuality based on a Cartesian separation between subject and object, underpinning the ascendance of European hegemony and colonialism, aligns with the core premises of orthodox development discourse. An example of how visual representations of development matter is presented through images of Africa–China relations in western media sources. Using widely circulated images depicting China's impact on African development in western news media sources as an example of why visual politics matters for policy-making, the article examines how images play a role in legitimizing development planning by rendering associated forms of epistemological and structural violence ‘invisible to the viewer’.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
132740
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
In the past several years, the Republic of Korea-a former least developed country (LDC) and aid recipient that became a donor-joined the "club of emerging donors" to Africa. In March 2006, President Roh Moohyun declared Korea's Initiative for Africa's Development. The initiative puts poverty reduction and socioeconomic development of African countries in the forefront. Using pooled cross-sectional time series data, in this study we examine the determinants of Korean bilateral official development assistance (ODA) to Africa for the period 1991-2011. The findings of the study suggest that the approach of Korean ODA does not differ significantly from that of many conventional donors whose ODA disbursement has had a dual purpose: to improve the welfare of developing countries and to serve self-interests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
132937
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article aims to highlight the impact of the Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development - KFAED on Kuwait's foreign relations, especially with African countries, for more than five decades (KFAED) has strengthened Kuwait's ties to the developing world and secured political support throughout various crisis, particularly the Iraqi invasion of 1990. The article sheds light specifically on the nature, event and scope of KFAED activities in Africa. Secondly, the article show how to the fund has helped numerous African countries in various economic aspects as well as contributing to social development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
136744
|
|
|
Publication |
DelhI, ArunThesis, 2015.
|
Description |
xi, 321p.Pbk
|
Standard Number |
9789351749455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
058120 | 327.6/YAR 058120 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
119441
|
|
|
Publication |
2013.
|
Summary/Abstract |
South Africa, the continental economic giant and self-appointed spokesman for African development, is finding its distinctive national voice.
Emboldened by the invitation to join the BRICS grouping, its membership of the G20 and a second term on the UN Security Council, Pretoria is beginning to capitalize on the decade of continental and global activism undertaken by Thabo Mbeki to assume a position of leadership. Gone is the defensive posturing which characterized much of the ANC's post-apartheid foreign policy, replaced by an unashamed claim to African leadership.
The result is that South Africa is exercising a stronger hand in continental affairs, ranging from a significant contribution to state-building in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and South Sudan, to an unprecedented assertiveness on Zimbabwe.
But this new assertiveness remains constrained by three factors: the unresolved issue of identity, a host of domestic constraints linked to material capabilities and internal politics, and the divisive continental reaction to South African leadership. These factors continue to inhibit the country's ability to translate its international ambitions and global recognition into a concrete set of foreign policy achievements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
034446
|
|
|
Publication |
London, Butterworths, 1971.
|
Description |
342p.Hbk
|
Standard Number |
0-408-70067-x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
007959 | 916/POL 007959 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
099049
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
China, in its quest for a closer strategic partnership with Africa, has increasingly dynamic economic, political and diplomatic activities on the continent. Chinese leaders and strategists believe that China's historical experience and vision of economic development resonates powerfully with African counterparts and that the long-standing history of friendly political linkages and development co-operation offers a durable foundation for future partnership. Both in China and amongst some Western commentators a form of exceptionalism and generalisation regarding both China and Africa has been emerging. In this article instead we seek to develop theoretical tools for examining China as a geopolitical and geoeconomic actor that is both different and similar to other industrial powers intervening in Africa. This is premised on a political economy approach that ties together material interests with a deconstruction of the discursive or 'extra-economic' ways by which Chinese capitalism internationalises. From there we use this framework to analyse contemporary Chinese engagement in Africa. We examine the changing historical position of Africa within Beijing's foreign policy strategy and China's vision of the evolving international political system, looking in particular at China's bilateral and state-centric approach to working with African 'partners'. Chinese practice is uncomfortable and unfamiliar with the notion of 'development' as an independent policy field of the kind that emerged among Western nations in the course of the 1950s and increasingly China has come to be viewed as a 'rogue creditor' and a threat to the international aid industry. Rather than highlighting one strand of Chinese relations with African states (such as aid or governance) we propose here that it is necessary to critically reflect on the wider geopolitics of China-Africa relations (past and present) in order to understand how China is opening up new 'choices' and altering the playing field for African development for the first time since the neo-liberal turn of the 1980s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
156746
|
|
|