|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
084034
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
098817
|
|
|
Publication |
Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2010.
|
Description |
x, 193p.
|
Standard Number |
9781588266873, hbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
055221 | 303.609598/VAR 055221 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
084035
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Indonesia has witnessed explosive group violence in recent years, but unlike its plentiful economic statistics, the data on conflict are remarkably sketchy. Because the New Order (1966-1998) wanted to give the appearance of order and stability, it did not believe in publishing reports on group conflict, nor did it allow researchers and nongovernmental organizations to probe the patterns and causes of conflict. This article is based on the first multiyear dataset ever constructed on group violence in Indonesia. Following, and adapting for Indonesian conditions, methodologies developed and used elsewhere, we cover the years 1990-2003, split the data into various categories, and identify the national, regional, and local patterns of collective violence. Much that we find is surprising, given the existing theories and common perceptions about violence in Indonesia. Of the several conclusions we draw, the most important one is that group violence in Indonesia is highly locally concentrated. Fifteen districts and cities (kabupaten and kota), in which a mere 6.5 percent of the country's population lived in 2000, account for as much as 85.5 percent of all deaths in group violence. Large-scale group violence is not as widespread as is normally believed. If we can figure out why so many districts remained reasonably quiet, even as the violent systemic shifts-such as the decline of the New Order-deeply shook fifteen districts causing a large number of deaths, it will advance our understanding of the causes of collective violence in Indonesia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
117434
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
It has often been alleged, most recently in the recommendations of India's National Advisory Council (NAC), that the Indian state promotes, or is complicit in, Hindu-Muslim violence for political or electoral reasons. But the evidence for the claim has historically been sketchy. In StevenWilkinson's work, Votes and Violence, the argument is that the evidence supporting state complicity is systematic.We examine this argument and find it to be fundamentally flawed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
046183
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Oxford University Press, 2002.
|
Description |
xv, 382p.
|
Standard Number |
0195661168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
046079 | 305.800954/VAR 046079 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
054699
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Sage Publications, 2004.
|
Description |
271p.
|
Standard Number |
0761932879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
048845 | 320.954/VAR 048845 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
000723
|
|
|
Publication |
Oxford, University Pess, 1999.
|
Description |
xii, 312p.;tables
|
Standard Number |
0195648307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
042075 | 338.951/SAC 042075 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
076422
|
|
|
Publication |
2007.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The Indian economy is booming -- but the boom will last only as long as the vagaries of Indian democratic politics allow it to. Democracy and market reform are uneasily aligned in India today, and the additional reforms necessary to raise the lot of India's poor masses -- who have enormous voting clout -- may not garner a popular mandate at the ballot box. Although a long-term asset, democracy could prove to be a short-term headache for India's reformers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
105291
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
147307
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The last decade has witnessed an extraordinary spate of scholarship on the ethno-communal violence that swept through Indonesia following the collapse of the Suharto regime. Yet we know very little about how these large-scale violent conflicts subsided and the patterns of post-conflict violence that have emerged since. We introduce evidence from an original dataset to show that the high violence period lasted till 2003, after which violence declined in intensity and scale. Despite this aggregate decline, we find that old conflict sites still exhibit relatively high levels of small-scale violence. We conclude that Indonesia has moved to a new, post-conflict phase where large-scale violence is infrequent, yet small-scale violence remains unabated, often taking on new forms. Finally, we propose that effective internal security interventions by the state are a key reason, although not the only reason, why large-scale violence has not emerged again despite the continued prevalence of low-level violence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|