Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
081491
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Where does the clash of civilizations thesis and its underlying us-versus-them mentality come from? How has the idea been engineered historically and ideologically in the 'east' and 'west'? What were the functions of Christianity and Islam to these ends? These are some of the questions that will be discussed in this article that engages both the clash of civilizations thesis and the discourse of 'Orientalism' more generally. Dissecting the many manifestations of mutual retributions, the article establishes the nuances of the 'clash' mentality within the constructs we commonly refer to as 'Islam' and the 'west', showing how it is based on a questionable ontology, how it has served particular political interests and how it is not inevitable. What is presented, rather, is a short genealogy of this idea, dispelling some of its underlying myths and inventions along the way
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
072753
|
|
|
Publication |
London, Routledge, 2006.
|
Description |
viii, 188p.hbk
|
Series |
Routledge Studies in Middle Eastern Politics
|
Standard Number |
0415385598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
051420 | 953.053/ADI 051420 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
081917
|
|
|
Publication |
London, Hurst & Company, 2007.
|
Description |
xi, 271p.
|
Standard Number |
9781850659037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
053553 | 327.55/ADI 053553 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
078988
|
|
|
Publication |
2007.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article investigates how Iran is represented by neo-conservative activists and analysts primarily in the USA. It starts with the epistemological contention that every political activity occurs within a context, which is constituted by invented narratives, institutions, norms and other ideational factors. In a second step empirical evidence is marshalled that shows the mechanisms of contemporary US neo-conservatism, its impact on the decision-making process in Washington and the consequences for Iranian - American relations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
075088
|
|
|
Publication |
2006.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article explores the pluralistic momentum in Iran. It challenges the state-centric approach to Iranian politics, arguing that contemporary Iranian reformism manifests itself as a trajectory, yet original and indigenous, political culture that feeds into the political process in a bottom-up manner-from society to the state-not the other way around. Assessing the theoretical, methodological and empirical implications of this hypothesis, the article outlines the contours of Iran's reform movement and its interaction with the country's diverse civil society. As long as Iranian politics is driven by the pluralistic momentum, it is claimed, Iranian reformism will elicit political results and-to highly dissimilar degrees-will continue to provoke the silent subservience of central institutions of the state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|