Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
085889
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article illustrates how a religious conflict that started in 1999 on the island of Ambon in combination with an overall Indonesian financial crisis brought about the downward social mobility of many autochthonous Ambonese. In particular, the Ambonese employed in formal waged labour were forced to take up income generation strategies in insecure, informal economic sectors, which before the conflict had been dominated by the lower-class Muslim migrant community. This process was further encouraged by the spatial transformation during which these Muslim migrants became locked up in Muslim areas and Christian Ambonese took over their businesses in the Christian parts of the island. In a similar vein, the flight of many ethnic migrants to places outside Ambon stimulated Ambonese Muslims to penetrate these informal economic sectors in the Muslim parts of the island. As autochthonous Ambonese do not want to leave these jobs even since the violence has ended, competition at the lower-class bazaar level of the economy has vigorously intensified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
172225
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article traces the fortunes of one of India’s great libraries, which Tipu Sultan of Mysore amassed largely through plunder and which the British East India Company plundered in turn. It shows how Tipu used the library to legitimise his authority and how rival factions of the Company, after defeating him in 1799, did the same. The article links the figuration of loot in the subcontinent, as studied by historians of material culture, to the conceptualisation of British India, as studied by historians of political thought. More broadly, it attests the symbolic power that plunder had—perhaps still has—to confer prestige.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
125378
|
|
|
Publication |
2013.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The literature has generally not grappled with complex decision making structure within organizations like the UN. Special representative of the secretary- General can act as norm arbitrators in the UN System generating new practice by weighing against each other the conflicting norms that guide peacekeeping. Practices from the field, crystallized through the actions of SRSGs, Constitute a bottom-up source of influence on UN norm change processes. SRSGs enjoy relative independence and physical distance from UN headquarters. With background often from diplomatic careers, plus relative autonomy and interpretations of the UN, They can wield influence thank to a certain level of decentralized authority and their personal prestige.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
159271
|
|
|