Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:2182
Hits:24719536
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
SEYMOUR, LEE J M
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
121584
Plague of initials: fragmentation, cohesion, and infighting in civil wars
/ Bakke, Kristin M; Cunningham, Kathleen Gallagher; Seymour, Lee J M
Bakke, Kristin M
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2012.
Summary/Abstract
How do we conceptualize the fragmentation of internally divided movements? And how does variation in fragmentation affect the probability and patterns of infighting? The internal politics of non-state groups have received increasing attention, with recent research demonstrating the importance of cohesion and fragmentation for understanding conflict dynamics. Yet there is little consensus on how to conceptualize fragmentation, the concept at the center of this agenda, with authors using different definitions and measures. In this paper we conceptualize fragmentation along three constitutive dimensions: the number of organizations in the movement; the degree of institutionalization across these organizations; and the distribution of power among them. We then show how variation across these dimensions can explain variation in important conflict processes, focusing on infighting.
Key Words
Civil Wars
;
Fragmentation
;
Infighting
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
112857
Shirts today, skins tomorrow: dual contests and the effects of fragmentation in self-determination disputes
/ Cunningham, Kathleen Gallagher; Bakke, Kristin M; Seymour, Lee J M
Bakke, Kristin M
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2012.
Summary/Abstract
While theoretical models of conflict often treat actors as unitary, most self-determination groups are fragmented into a number of competing internal factions. This article presents a framework for understanding the "dual contests" that self-determination groups engage in-the first with their host state and the second between co-ethnic factions within groups. Using a new data set of the number of factions within a sample of self-determination groups from 1960 to 2008, the authors find that competition between co-ethnic factions is a key determinant of their conflict behavior. More competing factions are associated with higher instances of violence against the state as well as more factional fighting and attacks on co-ethnic civilians. More factions using violence increases the chances that other factions will do so, and the entry of a new faction prompts violence from existing factions in a within-group contest for political relevance. These findings have implications for both theory and policy.
Key Words
Ethnicity
;
Conflict
;
Fragmentation
;
Self - Determination
;
Cohesion
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export