Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:2714
Hits:21019110
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
GOVERNING AUTHORITY
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
151760
Just war theory & the conduct of asymmetric warfare
/ Weiner, Allen S
Weiner, Allen S
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
A central element of the dominant view of just war theory is the moral equality of soldiers: combatants have equal rights to wage war against one another and are entitled to certain protections if captured, without regard to which side's cause of war is just. But whether and how this principle should apply in asymmetric armed conflicts between states and nonstate groups is profoundly unsettled. I argue that we should confer war rights on fighters for nonstate groups when they are engaged in violence that has risen to the level of armed conflict, and when the state against which the war is being waged is not entitled to assert its monopoly on the legitimate exercise of force, either because 1) the nonstate group has established sufficient control over territory to assert its own governing authority; or 2) because the group is located abroad. Conferring war rights on nonstate fighters does not, however, permit them to engage in acts that violate the laws of war. Fighters who commit such violations are individually subject to prosecution without regard to their group's entitlement to war rights.
Key Words
Asymmetric Warfare
;
Just War Theory
;
Governing Authority
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
133948
Political devolution and resistance to foreign rule: a natural experiment
/ Ferwerda, Jeremy; Miller, Nicholas L
Miller, Nicholas L
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication
2014.
Summary/Abstract
Do foreign occupiers face less resistance when they increase the level of native governing authority? Although this is a central question within the literature on foreign occupation and insurgency, it is difficult to answer because the relationship between resistance and political devolution is typically endogenous. To address this issue, we identify a natural experiment based on the locally arbitrary assignment of French municipalities into German or Vichy-governed zones during World War II. Using a regression discontinuity design, we conclude that devolving governing authority significantly lowered levels of resistance. We argue that this effect is driven by a process of political cooptation: domestic groups that were granted governing authority were less likely to engage in resistance activity, while violent resistance was heightened in regions dominated by groups excluded from the governing regime. This finding stands in contrast to work that primarily emphasizes structural factors or nationalist motivations for resistance.
Key Words
Insurgency
;
Governance
;
Foreign Occupation
;
French Municipalities
;
German Municipalities
;
Governing Regime
;
Governing Authority
;
Political Devolution
;
Political Cooptation
;
Emphasizes Structural
In Basket
Export