| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
145208
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Queer isn’t a word you see much in the pages of Diplomatic History or the program for SHAFR’s annual conference. Indeed, a quick lexical check of article titles since the journal began publication in 1977 for “gay,” “homosexual,” “lesbian,” “transgender,” and “queer” brings up absolutely nothing (bracketing the single title reference to the Enola Gay). You may not be surprised. You should be. Queer history and queer studies occupy an increasingly central place in many historical subfields and in the work of other disciplines. Even for the redoubtable guardians of realism among political scientists in international relations, one can detect a queer turn.1 The time has more than come to better understand how queering the history of American foreign relations might transform our own scholarly practice, and the field itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
180322
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Throughout 2020, I spent a great deal of time contemplating and addressing the devastating impact of coronavirus on the academy, my work, and our world. I welcome the opportunity to give voice to some of these thoughts and thank Diplomatic History for organizing this important forum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|