Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
181601
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
America should seek to expand its coalition of allies and partners—but based on a country’s ability and will to help address interests it shares with America, not on its history with Washington or the nature of the country’s political regime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
181604
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Washington’s instinctual response to compete with the Belt and Road Initiative dollar-for-dollar is a losing proposition that plays into China’s long game. But with an offensive framework, American policymakers could turn the tables and transform the BRI into an albatross for the Communist Party.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
181606
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Japan is finally becoming an activist, sometimes ruthless defender of its interests—a “normal” nation, in other words. The United States needs to start treating it as such.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
181603
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
While China’s rise may not trigger a Thucydides Trap with the United States, the possibility of conflict remains due to increasing tensions in the South China Sea and the ratcheting up of threats against Taiwan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
181602
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
America’s strategic distraction has favored addressing foreign threats and those domestically with a foreign aspect, leaving a wide space for domestic extremism to go unchecked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
181600
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Walter Lippmann was right that the Cold War would expose America to great evils. He was wrong to think that America could not, or should not, accept them as the price of avoiding even greater ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
181605
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
James Burnham and Willmoore Kendall helped give birth and intellectual legitimacy to a conservative movement primarily defined by its opposition to liberalism, resentment of elites, distrust of democracy, and drive to fight the liberal destruction of America and “the West.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
181598
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Is the moment propitious for a return to an older containment doctrine that might serve as the animating spirit of the Biden administration?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
181599
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
American foreign policy elites have adopted a partial myth about containment in order to worship at the altar of grand strategy before declaring that such a sweeping approach is no longer possible. Both propositions are false and are driven partially by nostalgia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|