Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
189795
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
ON FEBRUARY 24, 2022, a Special Military Operation (SMO) of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation was launched in Ukraine to prevent new civilian casualties and a humanitarian disaster in Donbass, to denazify and demilitarize Ukraine, to prevent Ukraine from becoming a nuclear power, and consequently, to protect the state interests and sovereignty of the Russian Federation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
192429
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
AMID the crisis of the international order, there is a tendency for the properties of digital diplomacy (DD) to change. Warning messages, instead of mere statements and reports, appear in the information field with increasing frequency. This is especially clearly manifested in connection with the Ukraine conflict in the absence of dialogue (Russia-US, Russia-Ukraine, Russia-West) and diplomatic relations (Ukraine-Russia). DD is increasingly playing a proactive rather than reactive role, taking the place of, for example, negotiating platforms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
194217
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
THE open confrontation between Russia and the West that had begun in 2014 reached a new level after February 24, 2022. It became a "hybrid" yet full-scale and bloody war waged by the West against us by the hands of the regime in Kiev.1 The West responded to the Special Military Operation (SMO) with unexpected aggression. More economic sanctions, harsh political pressure, and another bullying campaign in the Western media could have been expected, but not the freezing of gold and foreign exchange reserves of the Russian Central Bank and not massive supplies of lethal weapons to Kiev.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
194226
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
IF an enlightened Russian reader five years ago had the opportunity to peruse today's news in Russian or foreign media, they would likely find it challenging to believe what they read and might suspect deception. This is understandable. Five years ago, some of the things happening today would have seemed unimaginable (except to those few people who, even then, could foresee the scenarios planned earlier and unfolding today; Vladimir Zhirinovsky shared some interesting ideas regarding future events, conflicts, and the civilizational struggle).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|