Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:948Hits:18635203Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID140400
Title ProperProcess tracing and qualitative causal inference
LanguageENG
AuthorWaldner, David
Summary / Abstract (Note)This essay critically reviews this symposium's essays on process tracing and security studies by James Mahoney, Andrew Bennett, and Nina Tannenwald. It covers three major issues that have not been adequately addressed by previous writings on process tracing: the relationship of single case studies to more general causal claims, the conceptualization of causation, and the criteria of valid causal inference. It introduces the “completeness standard,” which combines causal graphs, event history maps, and invariant causal mechanisms. The completeness standard, it argues, bridges unit-level causal inferences and average treatment effects, invokes an epistemologically warranted conceptualization of causation, and better satisfies existing standards of causal inference by making unit homogeneity assumptions more credible.
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Studies Vol. 24, No.2; Apr/Jun 2015: p.239-250
Journal SourceSecurity Studies Vol: 24 No 2
Key WordsSecurity Studies ;  Qualitative Causal Inference ;  Valid Causal Inference ;  Combines Causal Graphs ;  Homogeneity Assumptions ;   Process Tracing


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text