| ID | 141779 |
| Title Proper | Good, the bad, and the powerful |
| Other Title Information | representations of the ‘local’ in peacebuilding |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Simons, Claudia ; Hirblinger, Andreas T |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article argues for a reflexive perspective on the ‘local’ in peacebuilding. While it is now widely acknowledged that anything local is complex, unstable, and relational, scholars continue to make truth claims about local actors and practices. This leads to an incomplete account of peacebuilding, as it conceals the powerful effects of representation, which shape our perspective on the local. We argue that the local is both used and produced through practices of representation, and that these representations serve to define what good peacebuilding entails. We consequently suggest a perspective on perspectives, which focuses on how representations of the local relate to political agendas in peacebuilding, and which can account for the effects of choosing one mode of representation over another. Through case studies from Burundi and South Sudan, we show that representations of the local are conflictingly produced by scholars, practitioners, and government officials, telling about the true, the good, and the bad local, empowering some and disempowering other actors, institutions, and practices. These dynamics have tangible effects on peace, conflict, and (in)security. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Dialogue Vol. 46, No.5; Oct 2015: p.422-439 |
| Journal Source | Security Dialogue Vol: 46 No 5 |
| Key Words | Conflict ; Intervention ; Peace ; Knowledge Production ; Local ; (In)Security |