Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1595Hits:19745011Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID060419
Title ProperDemocracy and Diversionary Military Intervention: Reassessing Regime Type and the Diversionary Hypothesis
LanguageENG
AuthorPickering, Jeffrey ;  Kisangani, Emizet F.
PublicationMar 2005.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article concentrates on two limitations in the literature on diversionary force. First is the common assumption that major powers are the only actors capable of diversion. Second is the narrow conceptualization of regime type prevalent in the literature. Instead of dichotomizing regimes, we distinguish mature democracies and autocracies from consolidating variants of these regimes. We draw hypotheses from the institutional approach and test them with time series cross-section negative binomial first-order autoregressive process estimates of 140 countries from 1950 to 1996. We find that not all democracies and not all autocracies divert. Mature democracies, consolidating autocracies, and transitional polities are the only regime types prone to this type of force. Our results suggest that the diversionary literature would benefit from more discriminating operationalizations of regime type and by looking beyond major powers to the actions of less powerful states.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Studies Quarterly Vol. 49, No. 1; Mar 2005: p23-43
Journal SourceInternational Studies Quarterly Vol: 49 No 1
Key WordsRwanda-Democracy ;  Military Affairs ;  Rwanda-Social Problems