| ID | 072142 |
| Title Proper | Self-interest, foreign need, and good governance |
| Other Title Information | are bilateral investment treaty programs similar to aid allocation? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Neumayer, Eric |
| Publication | 2006. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Bilateral investment treaties (BITs) have become the most important legal mechanism for the encouragement and governance of foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing countries. Yet practically no systematic evidence exists on what motivates capital-exporting developed countries to sign BITs earlier with some developing countries than with others, if at all. The theoretical framework from the aid allocation literature suggests that developed countries pursue a mixture of self-interest, foreign need and, possibly, good governance. We find evidence that both economic interests of developed countries' foreign investors and political interests of developed countries determine their scheduling of BITs. However, foreign need as measured by per capita income is also a factor, whereas good governance by and large does not matter. These results suggest that BIT programs can be explained using the same framework successfully applied to the allocation of aid. At the same time, self-interest seems to be substantively more important than developing country need when it comes to BITs. |
| `In' analytical Note | Foreign Policy Analysis Vol. 2, No. 3; Jul 2006: p245-267 |
| Journal Source | Foreign Policy Analysis Vol: 2 No 3 |
| Key Words | Aid Allocation ; Foreign Direct Investment ; Bilateral Investment Treaties ; Governance |