Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1363Hits:19817194Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID073522
Title ProperCardoso report on the UN and civil society
Other Title Informationfunctionalism, global corporatism, or global democracy?
LanguageENG
AuthorWilletts, Peter
Publication2006.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The Report of the Panel of Eminent Persons on United Nations-Civil Society Relations was published in June 2004. It strongly endorsed the case for wider participation of civil society in all aspects of the UN's work, both at the headquarters and at the country level. However, the panel members displayed little understanding of the existing NGO consultative arrangements. Many of its recommendations were impolitic or impractical. The report was intellectually incoherent because it embodied three competing theoretical frameworks: functionalism, neocorporatism, and democratic pluralism. The functionalist emphasis on expertise and the neocorporatist emphasis on engaging stakeholders cannot offer criteria for participation on an all-embracing democratic basis. Reform is needed to provide facilities and resources to enhance participation by marginalized groups.
`In' analytical NoteGlobal Governance Vol. 12, No. 3; Jul-Sep 2006: p305-324
Journal SourceGlobal Governance Vol: 12 No 3
Key WordsUnited Nations ;  Civil Society ;  Cardoso Report ;  Functionalism ;  Neocorporatism ;  NGOs ;  Non-Governmental Organisations