Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:788Hits:19998703Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID073562
Title ProperSuper paradox of Leninist integration
Other Title Informationthe politics of legislating article 23 of Hong Kong's basic law
LanguageENG
AuthorYiu-chung, Wong
Publication2006.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Liao Zhengzhi, the late director of the Office of Hong Kong and Macau Affairs, once said that on the resumption of Hong Kong's sovereignty, Hong Kong needed only to change the flag and British governor. While the press was full of doomsday prophecies about Hong Kong's future, there was a camp of "super-paradox" theorists who genuinely believed that Hong Kong's status quo would not change after the handover. The authoritarian one party-dominated PRC, they asserted, could absorb a free-flowing Hong Kong without changing the nature of an open society. Contrary to doomsday prophets and "super-paradox" theorists, this article argues that while the doomsday prophecy was groundless, important institutional changes did take place even though they were barely noticed. It is argued, by using the example of the legislation of Article 23, that a gradual approach has been adopted by the Chinese Communist Party to change the fundamentals of Hong Kong's polity, a strategy that I call "Leninist integration."
`In' analytical NoteAsian Perspectives Vol. 30, No. 2; 2006: p65-95
Journal SourceAsian Perspectives Vol: 30 No 2
Key WordsHong Kong ;  Article 23 ;  Political Development ;  China ;  Communist Parties ;  East Asia ;  Human Rights ;  Democracy