| ID | 074075 |
| Title Proper | Global importance of illiberal moderates |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Etzioni, Amitai |
| Publication | 2006. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In contrast to the claim that the most significant fault line in contemporary global affairs is between the civilisation of the West and all others, this essay argues that the schism between those who advance their values through violence and those who rely on persuasion, both of which are present in all civilisations, is the greatest source of conflict in the post-Cold-War era. Moderates come in many stripes: some are liberal, such as Reform Jews and Social Democrats, while most others are illiberal, including many Muslim religious leaders. All moderates, however, share in common a principled rejection of violence. Polls and reports from around the world bear out that a conviction of the value of persuasion over coercion does not depend on faith in democracy or secularism. The West should ally itself with such moderates, no matter how liberal or illiberal their orientation. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 19, No. 3; Sep 2006: p369-385 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol: 19 No 3 |
| Key Words | World Politics ; Moderates ; Post-Cold War Period |