| ID | 074076 |
| Title Proper | Punitive justifications or just punishment? an ethical reading of coercive diplomacy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Lang, Anthony F |
| Publication | 2006. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Can the use of military force in response to violations of human rights norms be meaningfully described as 'punishment'? If so, does this form of punishment help to constitute a just and peaceful international order? This paper investigates these two questions by examining the use of strategic bombing in campaigns of coercive diplomacy as a means to punish states. The paper explores the concept of punishment and its relevance for international affairs as a theoretical basis. It then turns to two cases of punitive uses of force-US and UK strikes against Iraq in 1998 and NATO strikes against Serbia in 1999. These two military campaigns are assessed as punitive but not necessarily just in that they fail to fit within a clear, legal institutional order and confuse the agent that deserves punishment. The paper concludes by suggesting that while punishment may be necessary for a legitimate international order, current punitive actions do not support such an order. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 19, No. 3; Sep 2006: p389-403 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol: 19 No 3 |
| Key Words | International Order ; Punishment ; Use of Force ; Coercive Diplomacy |