| ID | 074079 |
| Title Proper | Carl Schmitt's five arguments against the idea of just war |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Slomp, Gabriella |
| Publication | 2006. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Carl Schmitt famously alleged that a commitment to just war fosters the criminalisation and demonisation of the enemy. The aim of this paper is to trace, analyse and evaluate five arguments that can be found in Schmitt's opus elucidating and supporting the above claims. The paper suggests that even though Schmitt's critique of just war is typically extreme, it can nevertheless enrich the current debate on just war in so far as it challenges the common claim that the just war tradition occupies the middle ground between bellicism (that always justifies war) and pacifism (that never justifies war). Arguing against this widely held view, Schmitt claims that in the 20th century a belief in just war, far from representing a moderate position between extremes, is instead at the fore of an ideology that aims at dehumanising anyone who does not share its core values. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 19, No. 3; Sep 2006: p435-447 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol: 19 No 3 |
| Key Words | Just War ; Schmitt, Carl's Arguments |