| ID | 074083 |
| Title Proper | Nordic-Baltic area |
| Other Title Information | divisive geopolitics at work |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Mouritzen, Hans |
| Publication | 2006. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | States in the Nordic-Baltic area reacted heterogeneously to the Iraq War operation: Denmark chose to participate; Iceland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania supported the operation diplomatically or materially; whereas Norway, Finland and Sweden were negative. The research tool used to explain this pattern is the parsimonious theory of 'past and present geopolitics', taking issue with systemic neorealism, primarily. In spite of official rhetoric emphasizing Baghdad or New York (the UN), states' driving forces were mainly found in their different salient environments. The primary explanation, proximate power balancing, was at work regarding Denmark, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Iceland, with no big neighbour, could enjoy profit bandwagoning, while Sweden and Finland followed 'standard operating procedures'. A minor aberration from expectations is noted regarding Finland: its EU balancing rather than US balancing of Russia. The Norwegian 'no' and Danish warfare were both an expression of geopolitical freedom of manoeuvre. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 19, No. 3; Sep 2006: p495-511 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol: 19 No 3 |
| Key Words | Nordic States ; Baltic States ; Iraq War ; Geopolitics |