| ID | 074353 |
| Title Proper | Asia-Pacific partnership on clean development and climate |
| Other Title Information | a complement or competitor to the Kyoto Protocol? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | McGee, Jeffrey ; Taplin, Ros |
| Publication | 2006. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (AP6) has been marketed as an innovative new approach to international climate change policy that is complementary to the existing Kyoto regime. It is important to closely examine these claims of complementarity, given the two nations that were central to the formation of the AP6, the United States and Australia, have both expressly repudiated the Kyoto process. The difficulty involved in this exercise is in separating political rhetoric regarding complementarity from the reality of how the AP6 will likely impact upon the effectiveness of the Kyoto regime. This article discusses the AP6 and the various claims as to complementarity with Kyoto made during its formation in July 2005 and inaugural meeting in January 2006. For the purpose of analyzing these claims of complementarity five key features of the content of the AP6 are identified for comparison with Kyoto. Stokke's theory of regime interplay is used to assess how each of the five key features of the AP6 will likely impact upon the effectiveness of Kyoto. This analysis indicates that at fundamental levels of regime interaction the AP6 has significant potential to obstruct the effectiveness of Kyoto as currently framed. The conclusion to be drawn from this analysis is that the claims by AP6 parties as to complementarity with Kyoto are only defensible at a shallow ideational level with significant obstruction likely at more fundamental levels of regime interaction. The reality is that the AP6 offers a competing regime in international climate change policy that at the very least has significant potential to affect the future shape of Kyoto. |
| `In' analytical Note | Global Change Peace and Security Vol. 18, No. 3; Oct 2006: p173-192 |
| Journal Source | Global Change Peace and Security Vol: 18 No 3 |
| Key Words | Climate Change ; Environment ; Asia-Pacific Partnership ; Kyoto Protocol ; United States ; Australia |