Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:693Hits:19043812Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID074410
Title ProperFrom DPT to DTP? America's own Clemenceau-Poincare moment and Transatlantic security
LanguageENG
AuthorHaglund, David G ;  Waters, Christa M
Publication2005.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article asks whether the differing manner in which liberal-democratic allies perceive security threats might prove corrosive to their alliance. In effect, the authors seek to test the assumption that 'democratic alliances' and liberal-democratic security communities are virtually indestructible so long as the members remain liberal democracies. The case chosen for diachronic analysis is the collapse of Anglo-American-French comity in the immediate aftermath of the liberal-democratic allies' victory in the First World War. Argued here is that differential threat perception (or DTP) contributed significantly to the ending of meaningful security cooperation among the group. In this sense, DTP seems to have weakened the conceptual underpinning of the democratic alliance implied by democratic peace theory (or DPT).
`In' analytical NoteEuropean Security Vol. 14, No. 4; Dec 2005: p485-502
Journal SourceEuropean Security Vol: 14 No 4
Key WordsUnited States ;  Transatlantic ;  Security ;  Differential Threat Perception ;  Democratic Peace Theory ;  Democratic Alliance


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text