Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:467Hits:19928774Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID075084
Title ProperRoad not taken
Other Title Informationinternational aid's choice of Copebhagen over Beijing
LanguageENG
AuthorEyben, Rosalind
Publication2006.
Summary / Abstract (Note)A decade after the United Nations conferences on gender equality and social development, this paper explores their policy origins and discusses their differential impact on international aid since 1995. The author draws on her direct experience to consider why Copenhagen led to Poverty Reduction Strategies and the first Millennium Development Goal, whereas Beijing has become largely invisible in the mainstream world of aid. She argues that the powerful influence of economic rational choice theory associated with bureaucratic modes of thought has meant that the central debate in development policy has remained that of growth versus equity. Beijing's agenda of societal transformation offered another paradigm of development that has remained marginal. The paper concludes with a proposal. If international aid policy could handle more than one paradigm and thus be more open to different ways of thinking about economy, society and politics, aid agencies would be better able to support transformative processes for social justice.
`In' analytical NoteThird World Quarterly Vol. 27, No. 4; 2006: p595-608
Journal SourceThird World Quarterly Vol: 27 No 4
Key WordsInternational Aid ;  Aid Agencies ;  Development Policy ;  Social Integration