| ID | 075278 |
| Title Proper | Comparative citizenship |
| Other Title Information | an agenda for cross-national research |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Howard, Marc Morje |
| Publication | 2006. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In this article, I attempt to integrate the study of citizenship into debates in comparative politics, in two different ways. First, I justify the real-world importance of the topic, and thereby encourage other scholars to grapple with its manifestations and implications. Second, I present some suggestive evidence, based on the 15 "older" countries of the European Union (EU). The findings not only illustrate the extent of cross-national variation in citizenship policies at two different time periods, but they help to demonstrate the applicability of comparative analysis to categorizing and explaining both long-lasting cross-national differences and more recent change in some countries. In explaining the historical variation within the EU, I consider whether or not a country had a prior experience as a colonial power, as well as whether it became a democracy in the nineteenth century. In accounting for continuity or change over the last few decades, I argue that while various international and domestic pressures have led to liberalization in a number of countries, these usually occurred in the absence of public discussion and involvement. In contrast, when public opinion gets mobilized and engaged on issues related to citizenship reform-usually by a well-organized far right party, but also sometimes by a referendum or petition campaign-liberalization is usually blocked, or further restrictions are introduced. This finding raises important, paradoxical, and troubling questions about the connection between democratic processes and liberal outcomes. |
| `In' analytical Note | Perspectives on Politics Vol. 4, No. 3; Sep 2006: p443-455 |
| Journal Source | Perspectives on Politics Vol: 4 No 3 |
| Key Words | Comparative Politics ; Citizenship ; European Union |