| ID | 075610 |
| Title Proper | Communications, qajar irredentism and the strategies of British India |
| Other Title Information | the makran coast telegraph and British policy of containing persia in the East (Baluchistan)-part II |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Shahvar, Soli |
| Publication | 2006. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Persian territorial designs in Baluchistan clashed with British interest to construct an Indo-European telegraph line through the Makran Coast, where Britain had close local allies in dispute with Persia. The British prime interest being the speedy construction of the line, they decided on bypassing these disputed territories by connecting Bushehr, through submarine cable, with Gwadar-which they believed, contrary to the Persians, to be non-Persian. The Persian government protested against the British infringement of her sovereign rights, adopting both diplomatic and military approaches. This forced the British government to check the legality of the Persian claims. But the arbitrary was neither neutral nor fair, with Britain opposing the suzerainty of Persia over the chiefs of western Makran, while acknowledging the right of conquest by others elsewhere on the coast. This was in line with British policy of favoring governments bordering British India over Persia. Although unable to change the arbitrary, the Persian government still managed, in spite of her military weakness, to drag the British government into a hard bargain and tough negotiations. |
| `In' analytical Note | Iranian Studies Vol. 39, No.4; Dec 2006: p569-595 |
| Journal Source | Iranian Studies Vol. 39, No.4; Dec 2006: p569-595 |
| Key Words | Baluchistan ; East Pakistan ; Pakistan |