| ID | 077227 |
| Title Proper | Two concepts of liberal pluralism |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Crowder, George |
| Publication | 2007. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Is the liberal state entitled to intervene in the internal affairs of its nonliberal minorities to promote individual autonomy as a public ideal, or should it tolerate the nonliberal practices of such groups in the name of legitimate diversity? This problem can be fruitfully approached from the perspective of Isaiah Berlin's notion of "value pluralism." According to William Galston, value pluralism privileges a form of liberalism that is maximally accommodating of nonliberal groups and their practices. I agree that pluralism fits best with a liberal political framework, but I depart from Galston's interpretation of what liberal pluralism involves. Taking value pluralism seriously, I argue, implies a form of liberalism in which personal autonomy is a central public ideal |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Theory Vol. 35, No.2; Apr 2007: p121-146 |
| Journal Source | Political Theory Vol. 35, No.2; Apr 2007: p121-146 |
| Key Words | Liberalism ; Autonomy ; Toleration ; Value Pluralism ; William Galston ; Diversity |