| ID | 077228 |
| Title Proper | Contradictory state of giorgio agamben |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Passavant, Paul A |
| Publication | 2007. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | I argue that Giorgio Agamben employs two, contradictory theories of the state in his works. Earlier works, such as The Coming Community and Means without End, suggest that the state today functions as an aspect of the society of the spectacle where spectacle is the logical extension of the commodity form under late capitalism. This part of Agamben's work attributes a determined character to the state and a determining power to the economic forces of capitalism that conditions particular forms of the state. Later work, such as Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life and State of Exception, are preoccupied with the logic of juridical sovereignty and the increased frequency of states of emergency. This part of Agamben's work attributes a determining strength to the state under current conditions. Although his earlier work provides a more coherent narrative of how it is possible to move from contemporary society to ideal community, it does not provide the theory of political action necessary to overcome the power of the state he describes when he theorizes the state in Homo Sacer and State of Exception. None of the three possibilities of political action present in his later works provides passage beyond state sovereignty without violating his philosophical commitments. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Theory Vol. 35, No.2; Apr 2007: p147-174 |
| Journal Source | Political Theory Vol. 35, No.2; Apr 2007: p147-174 |
| Key Words | Giorgio Agamben ; Sovereignty ; State of Emergency ; Homo Sacer |