| ID | 077246 |
| Title Proper | On researching 'Ethnic Conflict |
| Other Title Information | epistemology, politics, and a Central Asian boundary dispute |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Megoran, Nick |
| Publication | 2007. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Providing a critique of alarmist discussions of the danger of ethnic conflict in Kyrgyzstan, and the positivist epistemological assumptions and research practices that underpin them, this article develops an approach to researching 'ethnicity' and 'ethnic conflict' through the use of focus groups. Uzbeks and Kyrgyz in southern Kyrgyzstan expressed similar views about the closures of international boundaries, framed in terms of ethnicity. However, this was not an essentialist notion, but rather a concept of authentic 'Uzbekness' or 'Kyrgyzness' predicated primarily on the performance of endogenous kinship practices and Muslim/Soviet notions of class morality, nuanced by geography. These overlaps and discrepancies provide resources for those wishing to articulate visions of future social formations wider than the range of options currently propagated by ethnic entrepreneurs. |
| `In' analytical Note | Europe-Asia Studies Vol. 59, No.2; Mar 2007: p253-277 |
| Journal Source | Europe-Asia Studies Vol. 59, No.2; Mar 2007: p253-277 |
| Key Words | Boundary Dispute ; Central Asia ; Ethnic Conflict |