| ID | 077454 |
| Title Proper | A case study of the construction of international hierarchy |
| Other Title Information | British Treaty-making against the slave trade in the early nineteenth century |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Keene, Edward |
| Publication | 2007. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article evaluates different theories of hierarchy in international relations through a case study of the treaty system that the British constructed in the early nineteenth century in an effort to abolish the slave trade. The treaty system was extraordinarily wide-ranging: it embraced European maritime powers, new republics in the Americas, Muslim rulers in northern and eastern Africa, and "Native Chiefs" on the western coast of Africa. It therefore allows for a comparative analysis of the various types of treaty that the British made, depending on the identity of their contracting partners. The article argues that a broadly constructivist approach provides the best explanation of why these variations emerged. Although British treaty-making was influenced by the relative strength or weakness of the states with which they were dealing, the decisive factor that shaped the treaty system was a new legal doctrine that had emerged in the late eighteenth century, which combined a positivist theory of the importance of treaties as a source of international law with a distinction between the "family of civilized nations" and "barbarous peoples |
| `In' analytical Note | International Organization Vol. 61, No.2; Spring 2007: p311-339 |
| Journal Source | International Organization Vol. 61, No.2; Spring 2007: p311-339 |
| Key Words | International Relations |