| ID | 077743 |
| Title Proper | Balance of power or the state-to-nation balance |
| Other Title Information | explaining Middle East war-propensity |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Miller, Benjamin |
| Publication | 2006. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The Middle East is one of the most war-prone regions in the international system. What is the most powerful explanation of the war-propensity of this region? I argue that neither realism nor liberalism are able to account for variations in regional war-proneness. Instead, I advance an alternative explanation based on the concept of the state-to-nation balance in the region. This balance refers to the degree of congruence between the division of the region into territorial states and the national aspirations and political identifications of the region's peoples. The balance also refers to the prevalence of strong versus weak states in the region. Thus, I explain the Middle East's high war-proneness by focusing on its relatively low level of state-to-nation balance. This imbalance has led to a powerful combination of revisionist ideologies and state incoherence. While other regions suffer from state incoherence, powerful revisionist nationalist forces, notably pan-nationalist and irredentists (the "Greater State"), aggravate this problem in the Middle East. These revisionist forces are often transborder and are especially powerful in the Middle East because of the high degree of external/transborder incongruence in comparison with all other regions. The combination of nationalist revisionism and state incoherence has made the Middle East more prone to violence than most other regions |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Studies Vol. 15, No.4; Oct-Dec 2007: p658-705 |
| Journal Source | Security Studies Vol. 15, No.4; Oct-Dec 2007: p658-705 |
| Key Words | Balance of Power ; State-to-Nation Balance ; Middle East ; Realism |