| ID | 079073 |
| Title Proper | United States, Japan, and the European Union |
| Other Title Information | comparing political economy approaches to China |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Wan, Ming |
| Publication | 2007. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This paper examines US, Japanese, and European political economy approaches to China, and their effect on US-Japan and US-EU relationships. Great powers with a greater security concern in dealing with another major country care more about power while those with less of a concern are preoccupied with calculations for wealth. China's rise and its actions have posed a far greater security challenge to the United States and Japan and are driving the two countries closer together. The political economy game involving China reveals a dominant welfare motive among the advanced market economies. The ambition to transform China politically has diminished. China's integration into the global market makes a relative gains approach difficult to implement. Globalization simply limits the ability of a state to follow a politics-in-command approach in the absence of actual military conflict, which explains why the political economy approaches of the United States, Europe, and Japan are not that different in the scheme of things. China's own grand strategy to reach out to the world to outflank the US-Japan alliance has also contributed to a divergent European policy toward China although there are severe limitations to Beijing's ability to drive a wedge between the United States and Europe. |
| `In' analytical Note | Pacific Review Vol. 20, No.3; Sep 2007: p397-421 |
| Journal Source | Pacific Review Vol. 20, No.3; Sep 2007: p397-421 |
| Key Words | United States ; European Union ; Japan ; China ; Great Power ; Political Economy |