Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:372Hits:19961325Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID079229
Title ProperDying to prove a point
Other Title Informationthe methodology of Dying to Win
LanguageENG
AuthorKiras, James D
Publication2007.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Dying to Win is one of the most important works on suicide terrorism. It purports to unravel the strategic, social, and individual logic that gives suicide terrorism its coercive value. The methodology that Pape uses to support his various assertions is problematic for three reasons. First, he defines his key terms in such a way as to artificially set suicide terrorism apart from other forms of political violence. Second, in a number of cases Pape selects data from single sources to support particular assertions when other sources of data, used together, could provide more rigorous and useful insights into the phenomenon of suicide bombing. Finally, Pape codes his data on suicide attacks according to a loose set of criteria which, if recoded, calls into question some of his broader conclusions about the strategic utility of suicide terrorism campaigns.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Strategic Studies Vol. 30, No.2; Apr 2007: p227-241
Journal SourceJournal of Strategic Studies Vol. 30, No.2; Apr 2007: p227-241
Key WordsTerrorism ;  Suicide Bombing ;  Violent Extremism