Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:508Hits:19968987Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID079483
Title ProperGreen Public Sphere in the WTO
Other Title Informationthe amicus curiae interventions in the transatlantic biotech dispute
LanguageENG
AuthorEckersley, Robyn
Publication2007.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The WTO's decision-making model of executive multilateralism has been widely criticized for its lack of accountability to civil society. However, through the mechanism of the amicus curiae brief, nongovernment organizations and other civil society actors have found a way of directly `inserting' the public interest concerns of civil society into the dispute resolution arm of the WTO, which has proved to be more amenable to `critical public reason' than the trade negotiation arm. This article critically explores both the text and context of the amicus briefs submitted in the transatlantic biotech dispute and highlights their role in generating a green cosmopolitan public sphere that seeks more reflexive modernization and facilitates horizontal forms of regime accountability. Cosmopolitan public spheres are conceptualized as specialized, intermediary structures, with multiple strategic and communicative functions, that mediate between supra-national governance structures and regional and domestic civil societies
`In' analytical NoteEuropean Journal of International Relations Vol. 13, Sep 2007: p329-356
Journal SourceEuropean Journal of International Relations Vol. 13, Sep 2007: p329-356
Key Wordsbiosafety • environmental NGOs • global governance • GMOs • Reflexive Modernization ;  Transnational Civil Society ;  Transnational Public Spheres ;  WTO and The Democratic Deficit ;  WTO Dispute Resolution Process