| ID | 079898 |
| Title Proper | After trident |
| Other Title Information | Proliferation or Peace? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Gittings, John |
| Publication | 2007. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The British government decision on `Trident renewal' forms part of a much wider rebuff to the non-proliferation and peace agenda. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty risks being discredited at its next review in 2010; new nuclear powers are setting the pace for others; another `war' is being threatened which will last `for generations'. There has been no post-Cold War peace dividend, and the chance to make up for lost time has been missed. War, not peace, is once again seen as the universal default mode.
It is now clear that traditional arguments in favour of peace and nuclear disarmament are never going to succeed. The view that one `cannot predict the unpredictable', used to justify the Trident decision, will always result in decisions being reached on a worst-case scenario. New arguments need to be developed with a broader appeal based not only on strategic calculation but on a compelling alternative world view.
Looking both forward and back into history we have to rediscover peace, not war, as humanity's central concern. Just as the test of the good ruler in ancient China was to maintain peace within the four corners of the kingdom, so today modern states have a shared obligation to exercise good governance across the globe. The effort to reshape our common goals will require a sustained exercise in the re-education of elites, and the mobilisation of multitudes |
| `In' analytical Note | International Relations Vol. 21, No.4; Dec 2007: p387-410 |
| Journal Source | International Relations Vol. 21, No.4; Dec 2007: p387-410 |
| Key Words | David Davies ; Good Governance ; Mobilising for Peace ; No-First-Use ; Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty ; Nuclear Tipping Point ; Trident ; Bertha von Suttner |