| ID | 080629 |
| Title Proper | Paranoid, potbellied stalinist gets nuclear weapons |
| Other Title Information | how the U.S. print media cover North Korea |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Gusterson, Hugh |
| Publication | 2008. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Mainstream American print media coverage of North Korea's nuclear weapons program has been deeply flawed, a reality that skews policy debates and confuses public perceptions. Even simple factual descriptions of the parties' obligations under the 1994 Agreed Framework have often been inconsistent and partial, informing readers about North Korea's obligations more than U.S. obligations, and rarely acknowledging U.S. failures. The media repeated allegations about an illicit North Korean uranium enrichment program based largely on anonymous sources, who made what seem now to have been misleading statements. Journalists rely for comment on administration officials or members of Washington think tanks, while making little effort to gather opinions from academics, those on the left (as opposed to centrist liberals), or experts in Southeast Asia. Journalists also frequently present Kim Jong Il in ways that erase the Korean perspective on U.S.-Korean relations. Accurate, nuanced coverage of events on the Korean Peninsula is vital in producing an informed public and a policy-making process that is judicious, supple, and intelligent. This article concludes with various ways in which the media could better report on North Korea |
| `In' analytical Note | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 15, No.1; Mar 2008: p21-42 |
| Journal Source | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 15, No.1; Mar 2008: p21-42 |
| Key Words | North Korea ; Nuclear Program ; News Media ; Agreed Framework ; Nuclear Weapons |