Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:510Hits:19969020Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID080823
Title ProperThreat, dehumanization, and support for retaliatory aggressive policies in asymmetric conflict
LanguageENG
AuthorMaoz, Ifat ;  McCauley, Clark
Publication2008.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Public opinion can permit or encourage retaliatory aggressive state policies against vulnerable but threatening out-groups. The authors present a model in which public support for such policies is determined by perceived threat from and dehumanization of the target group. This two-factor model predicts Israeli Jews' support for two retaliatory aggressive policies: the more hypothetical notion of Palestinian population transfer and concrete, coercive actions toward Palestinians. The authors find (1) that threat and dehumanization are distinct constructs, each having unique contributions to explaining support for aggressive retaliatory policies, (2) that threat and dehumanization significantly explain support for aggressive retaliatory policies when respondents' hawkishness, socioeconomic status (SES), and education level are taken into account, and (3) that the association of hawkishness and SES with support for aggressive retaliatory policies is largely mediated by threat perception. Results are highly consistent across two studies, suggesting the two-factor model may be useful for understanding support for aggressive action in situations of asymmetric conflict
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 52, No.1; Feb 2008: p93-116
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 52, No.1; Feb 2008: p93-116
Key WordsAsymmetric Conflict ;  Israeli-Palestinian Conflict ;  Public Opinion ;  Perceived Threat ;  Dehumanization ;  Israeli—Palestinian Conflict