Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1281Hits:19420304Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID080875
Title ProperConsensus-Expectations Gap
Other Title Informationexplaining Europe's ineffective foreign policy
LanguageENG
AuthorToje, Asle
Publication2008.
Summary / Abstract (Note)By 2008, what is commonly known as the EU's `capability-expectations gap' has narrowed considerably. While the EU has made notable improvements in terms of its resource availability, as well as the instruments at its disposal, a gap between what the EU member-states are expected to do in the world and what they are actually able to agree upon persists. This article argues that the primary reason why the European Union is unable to deliver the foreign and security policies expected is a lack of decisionmaking procedures capable of overcoming dissent. Repeated attempts to surmount the drawbacks of consensus policymaking have only marginally improved the consistency and effectiveness of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). These efforts are assessed by applying consensus as a `conceptual lens' through which to select and assess information. The real-world impact of the lack of cohesiveness, the capacity to make assertive collective decisions and stick to them, is illustrated by Europe's handling of the crisis in the Sudanese province of Darfur in the period 2003-08. The main finding of the article is that as long as the consensus-expectations gap exists, the EU is likely to remain a partial and inconsistent foreign policy actor.
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Dialogue Vol. 39, No.1; Feb 2008: p121-141
Journal SourceSecurity Dialogue Vol. 39, No.1; Feb 2008: p121-141
Key WordsEuropean Union ;  ESDP ;  CFSP ;  European Security Strategy ;  Consensus ;  Darfur