| ID | 081249 |
| Title Proper | Surprise Attacks |
| Other Title Information | Are They Inevitable? Moving Beyond the Orthodox-Revisionist Dichotomy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Honig, Or |
| Publication | 2008. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This study seeks to adjudicate between the two schools of intelligence: the "Orthodox School" which argues that the inherent pathologies and obstacles in the intelligence work make a significant degree of successful surprise inevitable in almost all attempts and the "Revisionist School" which asserts that the roots of surprise attacks lie in avoidable mistakes of certain intelligence officials. By examining the classic case of the Yom Kippur surprise attack, the paper finds the middle ground between the two schools. It distinguishes between the real limits facing analysts and surmountable obstacles. Based on this distinction it determines which problems can be corrected or mitigated and which cannot. It also provides criteria to determine the varying levels of difficulty for predicting attacks. Finally, it finds that intelligence inevitably involves making subjective judgments and utilizing experience correctly, and therefore successful prediction depends on the quality of the analysts |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Studies Vol. 17, No.1; Jan-Mar 2008: p72-106 |
| Journal Source | Security Studies Vol. 17, No.1; Jan-Mar 2008: p72-106 |
| Key Words | Surprise Attacks ; Military Intelligence |